Тема: what is a good reference for a Global warming research paper?

Surveys of climate scientists have found strong agreement (97–98%) regarding AGW amongst publishing climate experts (Doran and Zimmerman 2009 , Anderegg et al 2010 ). Repeated surveys of scientists found that scientific agreement about AGW steadily increased from 1996 to 2009 (Bray 2010 ). This is reflected in the increasingly definitive statements issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on the attribution of recent GW (Houghton et al 1996 ,  2001 , Solomon et al 2007 ).

The peer-reviewed scientific literature provides a ground-level assessment of the degree of consensus among publishing scientists. An analysis of abstracts published from 1993–2003 matching the search 'global climate change' found that none of 928 papers disagreed with the consensus position on AGW (Oreskes 2004 ). This is consistent with an analysis of citation networks that found a consensus on AGW forming in the early 1990s (Shwed and Bearman 2010 ).

Order paper here global warming research papers

Surveys of climate scientists have found strong agreement (97–98%) regarding AGW amongst publishing climate experts (Doran and Zimmerman 2009 , Anderegg et al 2010 ). Repeated surveys of scientists found that scientific agreement about AGW steadily increased from 1996 to 2009 (Bray 2010 ). This is reflected in the increasingly definitive statements issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on the attribution of recent GW (Houghton et al 1996 ,  2001 , Solomon et al 2007 ).

The peer-reviewed scientific literature provides a ground-level assessment of the degree of consensus among publishing scientists. An analysis of abstracts published from 1993–2003 matching the search ''global climate change'' found that none of 928 papers disagreed with the consensus position on AGW (Oreskes 2004 ). This is consistent with an analysis of citation networks that found a consensus on AGW forming in the early 1990s (Shwed and Bearman 2010 ).

surfacestations.org wattsupwiththat.com

You might ask yourself which of the following questions are most interesting to you, doing the research to find out the state of knowledge on them, and then checking to see if there is reason to think that things are somehow different now: Does population growth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_growth accelerate or decelerate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_population_increase_history.svg with global warming and global cooling? http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1910/to:1942/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1975/plot/hadcrut3vgl/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1975/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1910/to:1942/trend/plot/hadcrut3vgl/mean:60 What are the regional effects? http://www.ssmi.com/data/msu/graphics/TLT/plots/MSU_AMSU_Channel_TLT_Trend_Map_v03_3_1979_2010.png Does population growth tend to cause global warming http://www.randombio.com//co2.html or cooling or vice versa? Which is more causal the global temperature change or the population growth rate change? Is there a lead or a lag between the 2 variables? http://econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/AGW/Loehle/Loehle_McC_E&E_2008.pdf What other factors are involved? Should we be concerned? http://www.foresight.org/nanodot/?p=3553